«

»

Feb 09

Print this Post

Another Undisclosed $17 billion Federal Deficit Increase

The Senate approved the repeal the expanded 1099 information reporting requirements contained in last year’s health care law. This has bipartisan support, so the change is widely expected to also clear the House.  At the time of the original passage, we discussed details of these requirements and the significant challenges that such reporting would require.  The additional 1099 reporting was to be effective for payments made after December 31, 2011, but it now looks like it will be repealed before ever being required.

The real story involves the reason that the 1099 reporting was expanded in the first place.  The expanded 1099 reporting was passed to pay for a part of the health care benefits of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).  It is widely agreed that significant income tax goes unreported.  The IRS income-matching program involving Form W-2 and Form 1099 is one of the easiest ways of bringing additional income into the tax system.  Of course, this benefit to the government ignores the challenges and costs faced by businesses that must comply with this reporting.  Because the additional 1099 reporting is onerous, most in Congress are not anxious to face the consequences of the 1099 reporting that partially funded the PPACA.

 As part of the PPACA cost estimating process, the additional 1099 reporting was estimated to raise $17 billion of taxes over 10 years.  Now, this estimated $17 billion will not be collected.  Supposedly, to avoid adding to the budget deficit, the current 1099 change authorizes the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to cut unnecessary unobligated spending.  The Social Security Administration’s expenses are exempt from any proposed cut.  But, other than exempting Social Security, no specific spending cut is identified or required.  So, the OMB Director is supposed to wave his budget-cutting wand and eliminate $17 billion of spending. 

 Wouldn’t it be nice if balancing the budget were that easy?  Since the OMB Director is at it, perhaps he should also just eliminate the rest of the federal budget deficit. 

 Voters should demand more of Congress.  Until some specific spending decreases are identified, the reality is that the federal deficit just increased another $17 billion.  For anyone who claimed the PPACA had a specific budget effect, the repeal of the underlying revenue generation is a big deal.  This is particularly true since the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) also amended its cost estimate of the PPACA to account for serious omissions that existed in the estimates the CBO initially gave Congress, and upon which Congress supposedly based its voting decision.

About the author

David Nolte

I am a founding principal of Fulcrum Inquiry, an accounting and economic consulting firm that performs damage analysis for commercial litigation, forensic accountings, financial investigations, and business valuations. I am a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) and an Accredited Senior Appraiser (ASA), as well as having other professional credentials. I regularly serve as an expert witness involving damages measurement. My litigation-oriented resume is on Fulcrum's website.

Permanent link to this article: http://betweenthenumbers.net/2011/02/another-undisclosed-17-billion-federal-deficit-increase/

5 comments

Skip to comment form

  1. Daniel Nolte

    When the House Leadership set up their ‘cutgo’ rules for this session of congress they specifically excluded the cost of repealing the health care law. Since the expanded 1099 change was part of the health care law I guess they believe that is their cover for this action.

    I think some of the new members of congress believe their campaign rhetoric that there is just billions easily found in the budget and that if they just turn to the right page they will find something like this:

    Waste………..$300,000,000,000

  2. frostwire

    Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wished to say that I’ve truly enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. After all I will be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!

  3. limewire pro

    Definitely believe that which you said. Your favorite justification appeared to be on the web the easiest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed while people think about worries that they just do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people could take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

  4. rtyecript

    I really liked the article, and the very cool blog

  5. designer technical

    Now and then I’ll stumble across a post like this and I’ll recall that there really are still interesting pages on the web.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*