About the author
Daniel Nolte
Architect, Network Administrator, Computer Forensics Administrator, Voiceovers. website,
Permanent link to this article: http://betweenthenumbers.net/2011/10/tough-choices-behind-glib-facts/
Sponsor
Between the Numbers is sponsored by Fulcrum Inquiry. Fulcrum Inquiry is a consulting firm whose services include calculation of litigation damages and related expert testimony, forensic accounting, financial investigations, economic analysis, and business appraisals.
Thought for the Day
Jorge Luis Borges (1899 – 1986)
Argentine writer
Archives
- December 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (4)
- August 2016 (5)
- February 2016 (1)
- October 2015 (1)
- August 2015 (2)
- July 2015 (4)
- June 2015 (6)
- May 2015 (6)
- April 2015 (6)
- March 2015 (11)
- February 2015 (5)
- January 2015 (14)
- December 2014 (5)
- November 2014 (1)
- October 2014 (2)
- September 2014 (2)
- August 2014 (2)
- July 2014 (4)
- June 2014 (6)
- May 2014 (4)
- April 2014 (9)
- March 2014 (12)
- February 2014 (12)
- January 2014 (15)
- December 2013 (17)
- November 2013 (18)
- October 2013 (20)
- September 2013 (17)
- August 2013 (21)
- July 2013 (25)
- June 2013 (23)
- May 2013 (22)
- April 2013 (19)
- March 2013 (21)
- February 2013 (22)
- January 2013 (27)
- December 2012 (26)
- November 2012 (22)
- October 2012 (19)
- September 2012 (17)
- August 2012 (28)
- July 2012 (27)
- June 2012 (27)
- May 2012 (31)
- April 2012 (27)
- March 2012 (31)
- February 2012 (36)
- January 2012 (27)
- December 2011 (23)
- November 2011 (27)
- October 2011 (22)
- September 2011 (21)
- August 2011 (25)
- July 2011 (26)
- June 2011 (30)
- May 2011 (30)
- April 2011 (26)
- March 2011 (25)
- February 2011 (27)
- January 2011 (28)
- December 2010 (9)
Categories
- Appraisal/Valuation (52)
- Bankruptcy (9)
- Capital Markets (18)
- Class Action (13)
- Commentary (165)
- Computer Forensics (12)
- Damages (118)
- Discovery (7)
- Disgorgement (5)
- Economic Damages (25)
- Economics (144)
- Employer Discrimination (4)
- Environment (2)
- Expert Witnesses (30)
- Failure to promote (2)
- Financial regulation (36)
- Financial Reporting (68)
- Forensic Accounting (120)
- Fraud (59)
- Health Care (22)
- Intellectual Property (71)
- Internal Controls (1)
- Just for Fun (92)
- Lost Earnings (16)
- Medical malpractice (8)
- Personal Injury/Wrongful Death (18)
- Personal Investments (111)
- Ponzi Scheme (2)
- Product liability (8)
- Public Policy (178)
- Real Estate (12)
- Research and Polls (83)
- Statistics (76)
- Strategy (15)
- Taxes (165)
- Technology (135)
- Uncategorized (19)
- Valuation (7)
- Whistleblower Systems (53)
- Wrongful Termination (3)
Comments Policy
All postings (including those associated with Fulcrum Inquiry) are the opinions of their respective authors, and do not necessarily reflect positions of Fulcrum Inquiry.
Anyone is allowed to post comments on any article; however, comments appear only following review. Advertisements not pertaining to the blog subject, spam (bot generated) comments, foul language, ad-hominem attacks, and immature behavior will not be approved.
Useful Links
- Accounting Expert Witness
- Accounting Experts
- Accounting Forensics
- Accounting Onion
- Appraisal Expert
- Appraisal Expert Witness
- Class Action Damages
- Class Action Damages
- Damages Expert Witness
- Economic Damages
- Employment Damages
- Fraud Examination
- Lost Profits
- Royalty Auditing
- Statistics Witness
- Trademark damages
- Whistleblower Hotline
- Witness.Expert
The Lawyers Say….
All posts are copyrighted by Fulcrum Inquiry® as of their publication date
The authors and publishers are not intending to render legal, accounting, tax, or other professional advice. No client relationship is established from making general information available on this site, or from your making a comment or transmitting an email message to us. None of the information on this site should be used as a substitute for consultation with competent advisors that are able to consider the application of any general information to your specific situation.
While we have attempted to ensure that information contained on this site is reliable, we are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of such information. No guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness, or of the results obtained from the use of this information is provided.
Oct 12
Print this Post
Tough Choices Behind Glib Facts
Commentary, Public Policy
by Daniel Nolte
October 12, 2011
A recent citation of the statistic occurred when Michelle Bachman appeared on Fox News Sunday.
Now, the statement is absolutely true. The number of Department of Transportation employees earning over $170,ooo at the start of 2008, the number of DOT employees earning over $170,000 by the middle of 2009, and the fact that Obama took office and there was a stimulus program in between those dates are facts. However simply because there are facts do not necessarily mean that they are related facts.
So while the original statement about the number of employees is factually correct it is clear that it was but a tiny percentage increase that happened to cross the arbitrarily chosen $170,000 border, and a pair of dates that encompassed the election and stimulus.
So, are we getting our money’s worth?
Currently the absolute maximum that anybody in the FAA can earn, even the Administrator, is $173,700 per year with a possible regional cost of living adjustment of up to $6,000.
Moreover the starting salary of an air traffic controller will be more in the range of $50,000.
On the one hand, it would seem that in the private sector it would be completely impossible to get a CEO of an enterprise as large and complex as the FAA for only $173,700 a year. In the realm of CEO compensation that is laughably small. At least not without a mountain of stock options. Adjusted for inflation, Current FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt might have been earning more when he retired many years ago with 25 years as a pilot for Eastern Airlines. Also possibly less than he made as President of the Air Line Pilot Association and as the head of a private aviation consulting firm. Compared to his private industry value we are most likely getting him at a bargain.
With the air traffic controllers however it is almost impossible to figure out what to use as a benchmark. There is no other career that has quite the same combination of stress, responsibility and tedium. I guess though that in this job market you might be able to recruit talented people to take on the work for less than $50,000 a year. But having invested a considerable quantity of money in training them would you keep them when the economy improved? Would they stick it out to retirement in such a stressful job without the promise of increasing wages with seniority? Anybody’s guess.