« PCAOB Initial Inspections of Smaller Broker Dealers Uncover Significant Audit Failures
Fidelity Has the Right Idea, but Published the Wrong Answer »
About the author
Daniel Nolte
Architect, Network Administrator, Computer Forensics Administrator, Voiceovers. website,
Permanent link to this article: http://betweenthenumbers.net/2012/09/amazon-may-take-another-bite-from-california-retailers-now-that-it-is-one/
Sponsor
Between the Numbers is sponsored by Fulcrum Inquiry. Fulcrum Inquiry is a consulting firm whose services include calculation of litigation damages and related expert testimony, forensic accounting, financial investigations, economic analysis, and business appraisals.
Thought for the Day
Jorge Luis Borges (1899 – 1986)
Argentine writer
Archives
- December 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (4)
- August 2016 (5)
- February 2016 (1)
- October 2015 (1)
- August 2015 (2)
- July 2015 (4)
- June 2015 (6)
- May 2015 (6)
- April 2015 (6)
- March 2015 (11)
- February 2015 (5)
- January 2015 (14)
- December 2014 (5)
- November 2014 (1)
- October 2014 (2)
- September 2014 (2)
- August 2014 (2)
- July 2014 (4)
- June 2014 (6)
- May 2014 (4)
- April 2014 (9)
- March 2014 (12)
- February 2014 (12)
- January 2014 (15)
- December 2013 (17)
- November 2013 (18)
- October 2013 (20)
- September 2013 (17)
- August 2013 (21)
- July 2013 (25)
- June 2013 (23)
- May 2013 (22)
- April 2013 (19)
- March 2013 (21)
- February 2013 (22)
- January 2013 (27)
- December 2012 (26)
- November 2012 (22)
- October 2012 (19)
- September 2012 (17)
- August 2012 (28)
- July 2012 (27)
- June 2012 (27)
- May 2012 (31)
- April 2012 (27)
- March 2012 (31)
- February 2012 (36)
- January 2012 (27)
- December 2011 (23)
- November 2011 (27)
- October 2011 (22)
- September 2011 (21)
- August 2011 (25)
- July 2011 (26)
- June 2011 (30)
- May 2011 (30)
- April 2011 (26)
- March 2011 (25)
- February 2011 (27)
- January 2011 (28)
- December 2010 (9)
Categories
- Appraisal/Valuation (52)
- Bankruptcy (9)
- Capital Markets (18)
- Class Action (13)
- Commentary (165)
- Computer Forensics (12)
- Damages (118)
- Discovery (7)
- Disgorgement (5)
- Economic Damages (25)
- Economics (144)
- Employer Discrimination (4)
- Environment (2)
- Expert Witnesses (30)
- Failure to promote (2)
- Financial regulation (36)
- Financial Reporting (68)
- Forensic Accounting (120)
- Fraud (59)
- Health Care (22)
- Intellectual Property (71)
- Internal Controls (1)
- Just for Fun (92)
- Lost Earnings (16)
- Medical malpractice (8)
- Personal Injury/Wrongful Death (18)
- Personal Investments (111)
- Ponzi Scheme (2)
- Product liability (8)
- Public Policy (178)
- Real Estate (12)
- Research and Polls (83)
- Statistics (76)
- Strategy (15)
- Taxes (165)
- Technology (135)
- Uncategorized (19)
- Valuation (7)
- Whistleblower Systems (53)
- Wrongful Termination (3)
Comments Policy
All postings (including those associated with Fulcrum Inquiry) are the opinions of their respective authors, and do not necessarily reflect positions of Fulcrum Inquiry.
Anyone is allowed to post comments on any article; however, comments appear only following review. Advertisements not pertaining to the blog subject, spam (bot generated) comments, foul language, ad-hominem attacks, and immature behavior will not be approved.
Useful Links
- Accounting Expert Witness
- Accounting Experts
- Accounting Forensics
- Accounting Onion
- Appraisal Expert
- Appraisal Expert Witness
- Class Action Damages
- Class Action Damages
- Damages Expert Witness
- Economic Damages
- Employment Damages
- Fraud Examination
- Lost Profits
- Royalty Auditing
- Statistics Witness
- Trademark damages
- Whistleblower Hotline
- Witness.Expert
The Lawyers Say….
All posts are copyrighted by Fulcrum Inquiry® as of their publication date
The authors and publishers are not intending to render legal, accounting, tax, or other professional advice. No client relationship is established from making general information available on this site, or from your making a comment or transmitting an email message to us. None of the information on this site should be used as a substitute for consultation with competent advisors that are able to consider the application of any general information to your specific situation.
While we have attempted to ensure that information contained on this site is reliable, we are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of such information. No guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness, or of the results obtained from the use of this information is provided.
Sep 19
Print this Post
Amazon May Take Another Bite from California Retailers Now That it is One.
Commentary, Taxes, Technology
by Daniel Nolte
September 19, 2012
In other postings I have discussed various reasons why Amazon may have made this change in policy. They included:
Recently in an interview with the New York Times, Jeff Bezos suggested one more thing he wants to get from these new nearby warehouses:
The message is clear: Bezos isn’t talking about paying for overnight delivery, anybody can do that already. He is talking about having next day for the same cost as the two day shipping, which for Amazon Prime members is free. And what is also clear is that what Bezos really wants is free same-day delivery. The thought of Amazon offering free same-day home delivery is more than enough to send shivers down the spine of any physical store retailer.
Is that feasible? Can for example Amazon’s new San Bernadino warehouse offer same day delivery to all of Southern California for the same or less cost than they are spending for second-day delivery? Could the new Paterson facility do the same for Northern Califonria? I believe so, but not by following conventional methods, and that may be the other story.
Let’s start with some assumptions:
If you have ever tracked an important shipment on any of the major delivery services you know the sequence that a package travels through:
That’s a lot of steps, and the only way to get it to work for next day or same day deliveries is with a lot of rush handling and pushing the urgent packages to the front of the line. That is expensive, even if the package is not traveling far. Only so many packages can be pushed to the front of the line which is why the shipping companies charge such a premium for overnight and same day delivery.
Now consider the other scenario:
Three hour driving distance from Paterson and San Bernadino from Mappoint. Note how neatly they together blanket the state’s population.
As you can see a lot of steps on handling, loading, and unloading are removed. According to Google Maps a three-hour driving radius from San Bernadino will reach Santa Barbara, Bakersfield, and the Mexican Border in San Diego. It would be feasible for a driver to reach the destination area, deliver a vehicle full of packages, and return in one shift.
But every motorist here knows how California traffic can lengthen those travel times greatly. The order processing software can work around this. The trucks to the far reaches of the delivery zone can be loaded to depart at for example at 5AM ahead of the traffic to arrive at the start of the 8AM-6PM delivery window and a second batch sent during mid-day traffic to arrive nearer to the end of the delivery window. During rush hours deliveries will be processed for more nearby places.
Switching to a direct to delivery truck model for the warehouse could make a sub 24 hour delivery at the same cost as two-day delivery seem possible given Amazon’s scale and technical sophistication.
But here is perhaps the most interesting question raised: What color are the trucks?
At UPS they would hope that the trucks will be brown. For Fedex the Blue-Green-White of their ground service would suit them fine. And the post office would be rooting for the Red, White, and Blue. But all of the distribution and sorting infrastructure that represents these entities value-add have been bypassed. It is just a delivery truck and driver. Why couldn’t it be orange, black, and White…Amazon’s colors? If Amazon decides to do the delivery trucks themselves these Amazon-branded trucks and drivers will be visiting every community each day and otherwise returning empty. So what’s to keep Amazon from saying “Got something you need returned? Let us know and we will personally come pick it up at your door for free!”. One more thing to give the physical retailers nightmares.
None of this will happen immediately of course. The warehouse itself is not yet operational, and a change of this magnitude will not be done instantly even after that. But it would have been easy for Amazon to rest on its laurels after becoming the world’s largest book seller or the world’s largest internet retailer. It would have been equally easy to say that locating warehouses in remote no-sales-tax states was ‘how it has always been done here’ and ‘how we got to where we are’. But instead they are showing a remarkable ability to continue to look at what can be gained with large daring changes.