Combined, Two Studies Predict the Collapse Of Employer-Provided Health Coverage Under ObamaCare

Two different reports by reputable consulting firms each conclude that more than half of employers will eliminate or change their existing health care plans. The two reports focus on entirely different reasons for the predicted changes. Because of the combined effects of the two reported challenges, there will be few employer-paid health care plans that will be left unscathed by the time the Patient Protection Affordability and Care Act (“PPACA”) becomes fully effective.

The survey results are actually not surprising once the math is run on the unintended consequences of the PPACA. Particularly for employers with primarily lower-paid employees, employers can save money by curtailing benefits, thereby shifting the cost to the state insurance funds and/or the federal government.

An employer who does not offer required healthcare coverage is penalized $2,000 annually for each full-time employee (excluding the first 30 employees). The employer may not deduct these $2,000 penalties for tax purposes. However, other than the $2,000 penalty per employee, there is nothing that requires an employer to offer the otherwise expensive healthcare insurance mandated by PPACA. Consequently, the business decision faced by employers is whether to pay the $2,000 penalty for not offering health coverage, or pay for significantly more expensive health insurance that is otherwise required.

The government subsidy for many employees is greater than the $2,000 penalty. Consequently, an employer could pay the $2000 penalty, the employee could purchase insurance thorough the government-subsidized plan, and the employer could offer an alternative pay or benefit for the loss of the health insurance. In the correct circumstances, the employee and employer would collectively be as good or better off. Of course, the government will have an additional health insurance and related subsidy cost, but those are the economic motivations and incentives currently established in the PPACA.

The survey described above does not address the additional impact of the penalties on so-called Cadillac health care plans. Employers that offer more expensive health plans (except for union plans that received an exemption) will be penalized for offering better plans. The penalty is a 40% nondeductible penalty on the value of health care plan benefits that exceed $10,200 for single coverage or $27,500 for family coverage in 2018. The effect of the Cadillac plan provisions were addressed in May 2010 by notable benefits consulting firm Towers Watson. In the Towers Watson study, more than 60% of employer-sponsored plans will be classified as a penalty-incurring Cadillac plan once expected cost inflation has its effect by the provision’s 2018 effective date. These Cadillac Rules will cause the majority of remaining plans to be dropped.

This article discusses the two studies in greater detail.

Permanent link to this article:


1 ping

Skip to comment form

    • Henery Schaffer on July 6, 2011 at 8:40 AM
    • Reply

    I finally decided to write a comment on your blog. I just wanted to say good job. I really enjoy reading your posts.

    • Marina on September 19, 2011 at 8:37 PM
    • Reply

    You have really interesting blog, keep up posting such informative posts!

    • Блог о путешествиях on September 28, 2011 at 6:43 AM
    • Reply

    Thx for this great information that you are sharing with us!!!

    • Beatrice on September 15, 2012 at 7:29 AM
    • Reply

    Thumb up!!!

    • used cars in ghana on October 6, 2012 at 10:27 PM
    • Reply

    It’s hard to find educated people on this topic, but you sound like you know what you’re talκing
    about! Thanks

    • Going to take 2.5% pay cut in 2014 - Page 3 - Genesis Forum: GenCoupe Hyundai Genesis Forums on July 1, 2012 at 2:53 AM

    […] permalink I will be the first ine to admit i havent kept up with this topic very well but Unless something has changed, those people with the "Cadillac plan" as they call it will have to pay income tax on the portion of employer paid insurance benefits. For example say your federal taxable gross income is 50k but you have a cadillac plan and ur employer pays 10k a year in premiums for you, your taxable gross will go up to 60k significantly increases ones individual tax burden. I did a quick search and just attached the first two links, there very well might be better up to date info but from my understanding the penalty on cadillac plans is still in effect. Democrats Wrangle Over Taxing 'Cadillac' Insurance Plans | PBS NewsHour | Jan. 11, 2010 | PBS Combined, Two Studies Predict the Collapse Of Employer-Provided Health Coverage Under ObamaCare &#18… […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.