First-ever SEC deferred prosecution agreement is hardly a “game changer”

Deferred prosecution agreements have been used by the Department of Justice for criminal matters for years. There, avoiding criminal prosecution, potential imprisonment for employees, and potential effects on licensing or other regulatory requirements make such agreements highly advantageous. But the advantage of a deferred prosecution with the SEC involving civil penalties is less clear. When the Securities and Exchange Commission’s policy on deferred prosecution was announced in January 2010 as an approach to facilitate and reward cooperation in SEC investigations, Robert Khuzami, Director of the Division of Enforcement bragged that the SEC’s new policy “is a potential game-changer for the Division of Enforcement”.

About a year and a half later it is not at all clear that this is the case. The SEC announced its first-ever deferred prosecution agreement with a company who voluntarily reported a violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.  But based on the deal the defendant received, there appears to be little motivation to follow in this defendant’s footsteps.

Details are summarized in this article.

Permanent link to this article:

1 comment

1 ping

    • ustka on August 22, 2011 at 10:33 AM
    • Reply

    F*ckin’ tremendous things here. I’m very glad to see your article. Thanks a lot and i am looking forward to contact you. Will you kindly drop me a e-mail?

    • soft oatmeal chocolate chip cookies on August 19, 2011 at 7:45 PM

    WOW! check this out!……

    Amazing Post, worth a read……

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.