Renee Howdeshell
Renee Howdeshell is a founding member of Fulcrum Inquiry, an accounting, finance and economic consulting firm that performs damage analyses for commercial litigation, forensic accountings, royalty & distribution audits, financial investigations, and business valuations. Ms. Howdeshell holds a degree in Finance and Marketing from the University of Virginia's McIntire School of Commerce and is a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) and a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE). She has testified as an expert witness in federal court, CA state court and arbitration regarding the results of her work. She can be reached at (213) 787-4112 and her resume is available at www.fulcrum.com.
Permanent link to this article: https://betweenthenumbers.net/2011/12/checking-it-twice-is-a-good-suggestion-beyond-santas-list/
Sponsor
Between the Numbers is sponsored by Fulcrum Inquiry. Fulcrum Inquiry is a consulting firm whose services include calculation of litigation damages and related expert testimony, forensic accounting, financial investigations, economic analysis, and business appraisals.
Thought for the Day
Denis Waitley (1933 - )
Motivational speaker & best-selling author
Categories
- Appraisal/Valuation (44)
- Bankruptcy (7)
- Capital Markets (16)
- Class Action (14)
- Commentary (61)
- Computer Forensics (4)
- Damages (116)
- Discovery (7)
- Disgorgement (8)
- Economic Damages (36)
- Economics (37)
- Employer Discrimination (6)
- Environment (1)
- Expert Witnesses (31)
- Failure to promote (4)
- Financial regulation (28)
- Financial Reporting (56)
- Forensic Accounting (106)
- Fraud (63)
- Health Care (9)
- Intellectual Property (61)
- Internal Controls (2)
- Just for Fun (33)
- Lost Earnings (20)
- Medical malpractice (12)
- Personal Injury/Wrongful Death (23)
- Personal Investments (37)
- Ponzi Scheme (3)
- Product liability (9)
- Public Policy (58)
- Real Estate (8)
- Research and Polls (43)
- Statistics (46)
- Strategy (7)
- Taxes (61)
- Technology (37)
- Uncategorized (9)
- Valuation (8)
- Whistleblower Systems (56)
- Wrongful Termination (6)
Comments Policy
All postings (including those associated with Fulcrum Inquiry) are the opinions of their respective authors, and do not necessarily reflect positions of Fulcrum Inquiry.
Anyone is allowed to post comments on any article; however, comments appear only following review. Advertisements not pertaining to the blog subject, spam (bot generated) comments, foul language, ad-hominem attacks, and immature behavior will not be approved.
The Lawyers Say….
All posts are copyrighted by Fulcrum Inquiry® as of their publication date
The authors and publishers are not intending to render legal, accounting, tax, or other professional advice. No client relationship is established from making general information available on this site, or from your making a comment or transmitting an email message to us. None of the information on this site should be used as a substitute for consultation with competent advisors that are able to consider the application of any general information to your specific situation.
While we have attempted to ensure that information contained on this site is reliable, we are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of such information. No guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness, or of the results obtained from the use of this information is provided.
Dec 19
“Checking it twice” is a good suggestion beyond Santa’s list…
December 19, 2011
News reporting is notorious for requiring rapid turnaround on emerging stories and budget cuts have certainly increased the pressure. Perhaps as a result, there have lately been a number of glaring mistakes from organizations that pride themselves on their economic and business reporting. For instance, Business Insider recently provided an article regarding “6 Awesome Math Tricks That Will Make Your Life So Much Easier”, including one to calculate your hourly pay if you are a salaried employee:
“You’re a salaried employee and trying to figure out how much that wage earns you an hour, maybe for that part-time job you’re considering taking on. Take your salary, drop the last three zeros and then divide by the number two. So if you earn $40,000, you’re left with $20 an hour. Numbers work best if you’re only working a 40 hour week.”
There are a number of math tricks that allow you to quickly calculate a useful number (like the often mentioned rule of 72 also highlighted in the article), but this one certainly doesn’t make the cut as presented. The problem lies in the final sentence, which should read “Numbers work ONLY if you’re only working a 40 hour week.” This is one good reason to have the editor of your financial publication also be a “numbers person” and why it’s always a good idea to double check your work before it goes out the door.