Permanent link to this article: https://betweenthenumbers.net/2013/03/has-californias-tax-on-the-rich-driven-out-the-poor-and-middle-class/
Sponsor
Between the Numbers is sponsored by Fulcrum Inquiry. Fulcrum Inquiry is a consulting firm whose services include calculation of litigation damages and related expert testimony, forensic accounting, financial investigations, economic analysis, and business appraisals.
Thought for the Day
Denis Waitley (1933 - )
Motivational speaker & best-selling author
Categories
- Appraisal/Valuation (44)
- Bankruptcy (7)
- Capital Markets (16)
- Class Action (14)
- Commentary (61)
- Computer Forensics (4)
- Damages (116)
- Discovery (7)
- Disgorgement (8)
- Economic Damages (36)
- Economics (37)
- Employer Discrimination (6)
- Environment (1)
- Expert Witnesses (31)
- Failure to promote (4)
- Financial regulation (28)
- Financial Reporting (56)
- Forensic Accounting (106)
- Fraud (63)
- Health Care (9)
- Intellectual Property (61)
- Internal Controls (2)
- Just for Fun (33)
- Lost Earnings (20)
- Medical malpractice (12)
- Personal Injury/Wrongful Death (23)
- Personal Investments (37)
- Ponzi Scheme (3)
- Product liability (9)
- Public Policy (58)
- Real Estate (8)
- Research and Polls (43)
- Statistics (46)
- Strategy (7)
- Taxes (61)
- Technology (37)
- Uncategorized (9)
- Valuation (8)
- Whistleblower Systems (56)
- Wrongful Termination (6)
Comments Policy
All postings (including those associated with Fulcrum Inquiry) are the opinions of their respective authors, and do not necessarily reflect positions of Fulcrum Inquiry.
Anyone is allowed to post comments on any article; however, comments appear only following review. Advertisements not pertaining to the blog subject, spam (bot generated) comments, foul language, ad-hominem attacks, and immature behavior will not be approved.
The Lawyers Say….
All posts are copyrighted by Fulcrum Inquiry® as of their publication date
The authors and publishers are not intending to render legal, accounting, tax, or other professional advice. No client relationship is established from making general information available on this site, or from your making a comment or transmitting an email message to us. None of the information on this site should be used as a substitute for consultation with competent advisors that are able to consider the application of any general information to your specific situation.
While we have attempted to ensure that information contained on this site is reliable, we are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of such information. No guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness, or of the results obtained from the use of this information is provided.
Mar 10
Has California’s tax on the rich driven out the poor and middle class?
March 10, 2013
A recent article from the Wall Street Journal identifies a paradox: (i) “conservative lore” predicted rich people would leave California in response to a massive tax increase, yet, in fact, (ii) poor and middle class people have left instead.
As evidence, the article summarizes the following about those who have left the state:
1. Their median income is only $40,000, compared to a statewide median of $60,000.
2. Only 10% have college degrees while 30% of Californians have college degrees.
3. About 40% of them are Hispanic.
The third point is entirely superfluous since, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, Hispanics make up roughly 40% of the state’s population.
As for the first and second points, there really is only one point since low education is highly correlated with low income.
Meanwhile, the article notes that California has attracted more rich people, or, more specifically, those with incomes over $200,000, than it has lost. So much for predictions of the rich abandoning the state, right?
Not really.
The article’s period of analysis – the basis for all its population summary statistics – considers the population that has abandoned California since 2005. A lot has happened since 2005 – a hot housing market, a bust, a major recession, two presidential elections, a mild recovery, and a new California governor, among other things — but almost none of what has happened is an effect of California’s tax increase. The “millionaire’s tax” passed only last November. It is far too early to begin drawing conclusions about how this tax increase has influenced the demographics of California’s departing population.