Daniel Nolte
Architect, Network Administrator, Computer Forensics Administrator, Voiceovers. website,
Permanent link to this article: https://betweenthenumbers.net/2011/08/the-irs-400/
Sponsor
Between the Numbers is sponsored by Fulcrum Inquiry. Fulcrum Inquiry is a consulting firm whose services include calculation of litigation damages and related expert testimony, forensic accounting, financial investigations, economic analysis, and business appraisals.
Thought for the Day
Denis Waitley (1933 - )
Motivational speaker & best-selling author
Categories
- Appraisal/Valuation (44)
- Bankruptcy (7)
- Capital Markets (16)
- Class Action (14)
- Commentary (61)
- Computer Forensics (4)
- Damages (116)
- Discovery (7)
- Disgorgement (8)
- Economic Damages (36)
- Economics (37)
- Employer Discrimination (6)
- Environment (1)
- Expert Witnesses (31)
- Failure to promote (4)
- Financial regulation (28)
- Financial Reporting (56)
- Forensic Accounting (106)
- Fraud (63)
- Health Care (9)
- Intellectual Property (61)
- Internal Controls (2)
- Just for Fun (33)
- Lost Earnings (20)
- Medical malpractice (12)
- Personal Injury/Wrongful Death (23)
- Personal Investments (37)
- Ponzi Scheme (3)
- Product liability (9)
- Public Policy (58)
- Real Estate (8)
- Research and Polls (43)
- Statistics (46)
- Strategy (7)
- Taxes (61)
- Technology (37)
- Uncategorized (9)
- Valuation (8)
- Whistleblower Systems (56)
- Wrongful Termination (6)
Comments Policy
All postings (including those associated with Fulcrum Inquiry) are the opinions of their respective authors, and do not necessarily reflect positions of Fulcrum Inquiry.
Anyone is allowed to post comments on any article; however, comments appear only following review. Advertisements not pertaining to the blog subject, spam (bot generated) comments, foul language, ad-hominem attacks, and immature behavior will not be approved.
The Lawyers Say….
All posts are copyrighted by Fulcrum Inquiry® as of their publication date
The authors and publishers are not intending to render legal, accounting, tax, or other professional advice. No client relationship is established from making general information available on this site, or from your making a comment or transmitting an email message to us. None of the information on this site should be used as a substitute for consultation with competent advisors that are able to consider the application of any general information to your specific situation.
While we have attempted to ensure that information contained on this site is reliable, we are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of such information. No guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness, or of the results obtained from the use of this information is provided.
Aug 22
The IRS 400
August 22, 2011
Although it sounds like a stock-car race, the IRS 400 is the four hundred largest Adjusted Gross Income tax returns. Of course the IRS does not actually publish the names, but every so often they publish the year-by-year statistics for that elite group of individuals. The latest publication covers from 1992 to 2008. For 2008 it took an AGI of at least $109,736,000 to join what only can be termed the elite of the elite, a drop from the 2007 cutoff of nearly 138 million dollars.
The top 400 taxpayers earned 1.31 percent of all the Adjusted Gross Income reported on tax returns for 2008. That is up from just over a half of one percent of all AGI in 1992.
Obviously the IRS 400 had big tax bills. However, if you are a middle to upper middle class taxpayer who earned most of your money by wages, bonuses, partnerships, Schedule C, or similar means, the chances are very good that they paid a smaller fraction of their income in federal taxes than you. The IRS 400 had an average federal tax rate of 18.11 percent in 2008 and just 16.62 percent in 2007. FICA and Medicare taxes were on top of this, but for those in the rarified strata of the 400 these contributions maxed out millions of dollars ago and as a percentage of their total AGI, represent a tiny fraction of one percent.
So what kind of hotshot accounting trick did the IRS 400 pull off to so effectively stave off the maximum 35 percent tax rate? In fact only 143 of the IRS 400 fell under the Alternative Minimum Tax.
The primary answer is actually rather simple. Although the IRS 400 had 1.31 percent of all the AGI reported on all tax returns they had 13.10 percent of all reported Capital Gains and 10.49 percent of all Capital Gains subject to preferential rates. So while I am sure that the IRS 400 use every tax reduction measure available, most of their low tax rate is explained just by the preferential tax treatment of long term capital gains.
With over one in ten dollars of the tax benefit from the capital gains tax rate going to just 400 people, maybe it is time to re-examine how our tax code should, as in the words of the 16th amendment that enabled it, tax income from whatever source derived. I’m not against capital gains, but can we fairly claim that it is somehow more desirable than earning a paycheck or getting a bonus, or sharing in the profits from a business partnership or s-corporation? Those all contribute in their own way to economic growth.