David Nolte

I am a founding principal of Fulcrum Inquiry, an accounting and economic consulting firm that performs damage analysis for commercial litigation, forensic accountings, financial investigations, and business valuations. I am a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) and an Accredited Senior Appraiser (ASA), as well as having other professional credentials. I regularly serve as an expert witness involving damages measurement. My litigation-oriented resume is on Fulcrum's website.

Most commented posts

  1. Federal health care fraud enforcement efforts recover record amounts — 2 comments
  2. Perhaps $2 Billion Owed Under Music Contracts — 1 comment
  3. Huge Patent Damage Award Reversed — 1 comment
  4. Bear Stearns’ Defendants and Deloitte Face Significant Exposure — 1 comment
  5. House votes to reduce GRATs – Act before the effective date — 1 comment

Author's posts

Expert testimony may become common in USPTO appeals

In an April 18, 2012 Opinion, the U.S. Supreme Court in Kappos vs. Hyatt (10-1219) opened the door for expert testimony in federal district court actions in which a patent applicant challenges the USPTO’s denial of an application. The Opinion framed the issue being reviewed as follows: The Patent Act of 1952 establishes the process …

Continue reading

Permanent link to this article: https://betweenthenumbers.net/2012/05/expert-testimony-may-become-common-in-uspto-appeals/

Sixth Circuit Provides Practical Guidance Regarding Expert Testimony Admissibility

In Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. vs. The Raymond Corporation (No. 10-3912, April 3, 2012), the Sixth Circuit evaluated the trial court’s exclusion of Plaintiff’s expert testimony, and related successful defendant motion for summary judgment because of a failure to have minimally-required expert witness evidence. In upholding the trial court’s exclusion under the abuse of discretion standard, …

Continue reading

Permanent link to this article: https://betweenthenumbers.net/2012/05/sixth-circuit-provides-practical-guidance-regarding-expert-testimony-admissibility/

Big Plaintiff Victory in Revenue Sharing 401(k) Trial

In Tussey vs. ABB. Inc. (Case No. 2:06-CV-04305-NKL, March 31, 2012), a United States District Court for the District of Western Missouri decided an important case regarding common fees and revenue sharing within 401(k) plans. The case imposed extensive liability on the plan sponsor, resulting in $36.9 million of damages, plus Plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees. We …

Continue reading

Permanent link to this article: https://betweenthenumbers.net/2012/05/big-plaintiff-victory-in-revenue-sharing-401k-trial/

Filmmaker wins key victory in deducting losses

In T.C. Memo 2012-115 (April 19, 2012), a taxpayer won a notable tax case involving the hobby loss rules. The Tax Court framed the issue as follows:  We must decide whether petitioner’s documentary film production activity was a trade or business or a labor of love. Respondent asserts that Smile ‘Til It Hurts was the …

Continue reading

Permanent link to this article: https://betweenthenumbers.net/2012/04/filmmaker-wins-key-victory-in-deducting-losses/

AOL Surprise Sale Shows the Value of Mapping Technology

AOL recently announced the sale of over 800 patents and patent applications to Microsoft, and a non-exclusive license covering the rest of its retained patent portfolio. The sale price is $1.056 billion in cash. The sale includes the stock of an AOL subsidiary, which allows AOL to offset the patent sales against a loss involving …

Continue reading

Permanent link to this article: https://betweenthenumbers.net/2012/04/aol-surprise-sale-shows-the-value-of-mapping-technology/

Case provides primer on regression analysis and what can go wrong

After a jury trial, ATA Airlines (ATA) won a nearly $66 million verdict against Federal Express Corporation (FedEx). FedEx appealed that ruling. In ATA Airlines, Inc. v. Federal Express Corp., No. 11-1382 (7th Cir. Dec. 27, 2011), a distinguished panel consisting of Justices Easterbrook, Posner, and Wood criticized the complex damages analysis accepted by the …

Continue reading

Permanent link to this article: https://betweenthenumbers.net/2012/04/case-provides-primer-on-regression-analysis-and-what-can-go-wrong/

Hunger Games has an Important (but usually missed) Theme

The long-awaited movie adaptation of the book, “The Hunger Games”, opened last night. The publicity and anticipation for the opening was intense. The movie’s success is assured. Although no one will miss the action, at its core, the movie genre involves teenage coming-of-age, combined with a love story. But, practically none of the publicity and …

Continue reading

Permanent link to this article: https://betweenthenumbers.net/2012/03/hunger-games-has-an-important-but-usually-missed-theme/

IRS ignoring payments required by its whistleblower program

A former bank executive filed suit against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for failing to pay him a whistleblower award for information submitted in 2007. As initially reported in the Washington Post, Joseph Insinga … alleged that Rabobank Group, where he worked as an executive for more than a decade, helped seven companies avoid hundreds …

Continue reading

Permanent link to this article: https://betweenthenumbers.net/2012/03/irs-ignoring-payments-required-by-its-whistleblower-program/

NJ Supreme Court case requires privity of contract in accounting malpractice suits

On February 16, 2012, in Cast Art Industries, LLC v. KPMG LLP (A-51/52-10) (066891), the New Jersey Supreme Court unanimously reversed an Appellate Court decision that had upheld liability against KPMG failing to uncover accounting fraud involving an acquisition by Cast Art Industries of KPMG client Papel. The decision upheld the privity requirements of New …

Continue reading

Permanent link to this article: https://betweenthenumbers.net/2012/03/nj-supreme-court-case-requires-privity-of-contract-in-accounting-malpractice-suits/

Duran class action reversal not near as important as suggested

In California multiple (usually defense-oriented) articles are being published about the importance of a class action trail reversal in re: Duran v. US Bank National Association, California Court of Appeal, 1st Appellate Dist., (February 6, 2012). The articles incorrectly claim that statistical sampling cannot be used to prove liability in a class action case. The …

Continue reading

Permanent link to this article: https://betweenthenumbers.net/2012/03/duran-class-action-reversal-not-near-as-important-as-suggested/